Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorSuárez Castaño, Rodrigospa
dc.contributor.advisorSánchez Barrera, Franciscospa
dc.contributor.authorAcosta Giraldo, Jenny Andreaspa
dc.date.accessioned2015-07-03T18:29:51Z
dc.date.accessioned2015-07-13T19:54:08Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-26T21:09:13Z
dc.date.available2015-07-03T18:29:51Z
dc.date.available2015-07-13T19:54:08Z
dc.date.available2019-12-26T21:09:13Z
dc.date.issued2015-05-08
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10654/13989
dc.description.abstractLa deforestación resulta en cambios en la provisión de servicios ecosistémicos a escala global, regional y local. Servicios como la captura y el almacenamiento de carbono, la regulación climática y la atenuación de riesgos naturales como inundaciones son solo algunos de ellos. En Colombia la relación entre deforestación y la ocurrencia de eventos de emergencia de origen hidroclimático no ha sido estudiada a escala nacional y se propone que el porcentaje de deforestación tiene incidencia en la ocurrencia de eventos de emergencia relacionados con inundaciones, deslizamientos y sequías. Usando información de deforestación a nivel departamental y datos de eventos de emergencia de inundación, deslizamiento y sequía, se realizó un análisis espacial mediante un sistema de información geográfico y análisis de correlación entre el porcentaje de deforestación y la frecuencia de eventos de emergencia en tres periodos en el tiempo 2000-2005, 2005-2010 y 2010-2012. Los departamentos con mayor porcentaje de deforestación presentan alta frecuencia de eventos de origen hidroclimatológico, principalmente aquellos ubicados en la zona Andina y Caribe. Las variables de inundación y sequía presentaron una correlación positiva y significativa para el periodo de tiempo 2000 -2005 y de manera similar, para el periodo de tiempo 2005 -2010 las variables inundación, deslizamiento y sequía obtuvieron correlación positiva y significativa. En el caso contrario, para el periodo de tiempo 2010-2012 no se encontró ninguna correlación. En conclusión la pérdida de los bosques en el país puede estar reduciendo la prestación de importantes servicios ecosistémicos asociados a la regulación de inundaciones y sequías.spa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.titleCorrelación entre deforestación departamental y ocurrencia de eventos de inundación sequía y deslizamiento en Colombiaspa
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesisspa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.publisher.departmentFacultad de Ciencias Básicasspa
dc.type.localTrabajo de gradospa
dc.description.abstractenglishThe impacts associated with deforestation include changes in ecosystem services at the global, regional and local levels. Capture and storage of carbon, climate regulation and mitigation of natural hazards, such as floods, are just some of the services that have been affected by deforestation.In Colombia the correlation between deforestation and the occurrence of emergency events originated by hydroclimatic conditions has not been studied at national level and therefore, this study address the relationship between the rate of deforestation and the occurrence of emergency events related to floods, landslides and droughts. Using information of deforestation at the departmental level and emergency event data, regarding floods, landslide, drought, a spatial analysis was executed by making use of a geographic information system. On the other hand, statistical analysis was performed in order to find a correlation between the percentage of deforestation and occurrence events frequency for three periods of time 2000-2005, 2005-2010 and 2010-2012. The results show that departments with the highest rate of deforestation have high frequency of hydroclimatological events, mainly those located in the Andean and Caribbean regions. On the other hand, the variables: flooding and drought had a significant positive correlation for the period 2000 -2005. Similarly, for the period 2005 -2010 variables: flooding, landslides and drought had positive and significant correlation. On the contrary, for the period 2010-2012 no correlation was found.eng
dc.title.translatedCorrelation between departamental deforestation and occurrence of flood, drought and landslide events in Colombiaspa
dc.subject.keywordsclimate variabilityspa
dc.subject.keywordsecosystem servicesspa
dc.subject.keywordsemergency eventsspa
dc.publisher.programBiología Aplicadaspa
dc.subject.agrovocDEFORESTACION
dc.subject.agrovocINUNDACION
dc.subject.agrovocDESLIZAMIENTO DE TIERRA
dc.creator.degreenameBiólogospa
dc.description.degreelevelPregradospa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionspa
dc.relation.referencesAguilar A, Bedoya G. 2008. Informe de análisis inventario de pérdidas por desastres. Corporación OSSO. Cali. 69pspa
dc.relation.referencesArdila G, Andrade G, Benavides J, Carrizosa J, Garcia J, Rodriguez M, Rudas G y Ruiz J. 2013. Desarrollo económico y adaptación al cambio climático. Friedrich Ebert Stiftung en Colombia (Fescol). Bogotá. 220 p.spa
dc.relation.referencesAntonnisen M. 2010. Requerimientos institucionales y legales de los países de América Latina para la implementación de un mecanismo de Reducción de Emisiones por Deforestación y Degradación (REDD+) (Versión preliminar). CEPAL, GTZ y Ministerio federal de cooperación económica y desarrollo. 50 p.spa
dc.relation.referencesAylward B. 2005. Land use, hydrological function and economic valuation. En: Forest, water and people in the humid tropics, eds. Bonell, M. and Bruijnzeel, L. A. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge United Kingdom. 16 p.spa
dc.relation.referencesArmenteras D, Cabrera E, Rodríguez N y Retana J. 2013. National and regional determinants of tropical deforestation in Colombia. Environmental Changespa
dc.relation.referencesBanco Mundial. 2006. Fortalecimiento de la Gobernabilidad y Aplicación de la Legislación Forestal: Confrontando un Obstáculo Sistémico al Desarrollo Sostenible. Washington. 102 p.spa
dc.relation.referencesGutiérrez M y Espinoza T. 2010. Vulnerabilidad y adaptación al cambio climático Diagnóstico inicial, avances, vacíos y potenciales líneas de acción en Mesoamérica. Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo, Nueva York, 84 p.spa
dc.relation.referencesBradshaw J, Navjot S, Kelvins S y Brook B. 2007. Global evidence that deforestation amplifies flood risk and severity in ten developing world. Global Change Biology. 13: 2379 – 2395.spa
dc.relation.referencesBryant D, Nielsen D y Tangley L. 1997. The last frontier forests- Ecosystems and Economies. World Resources Institute, Washington, 54 p.spa
dc.relation.referencesBarber N, Charles V, Johnson E. 1994. Breaking the logjam: obstacles to forestry policy reform in Indonesia and the United States. World Resource Institute, Washington 126p.spa
dc.relation.referencesBruijnzeel L. 2004. Hydrological functions of tropical forests: not seeing the soils for the trees? Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 104: 185-228.spa
dc.relation.referencesBruijnzeel L, Bonell M, Gilmour D y Lamb D. 2005. Forest, water and people in the humid tropics: an emerging view. En: Forest, Water and People in the humid tropics, eds. Bonell, M. and Bruijnzeel, L. A. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge United Kingdom. 16 p.spa
dc.relation.referencesCarrizosa U. 1990. La selva andina. Págs 151-184 en: J. Carrizosa-U. & J.I. Hernández-Camacho (eds.), Selva y Futuro. El Sello Editorial, Bogotá. 23 p.spa
dc.relation.referencesCavelier J, Lizcaino y Pulido M. 2001. Colombia. Págs. 443-496 En: Kappelle M & Brown A. (eds.), Bosques nublados del Neotrópico. Instituto Nacional de Biodiversidad (INBIO), Santo Domingo de Heredia. 49 p.spa
dc.relation.referencesChakravarty S, Ghosh P, Suresh N, Gopal S. 2012. Deforestation: Causes, Effects and Control Strategies. Global Perspectives on Sustainable Forest Management. 1: 1 -26 p.spa
dc.relation.referencesCharney J. 1975. Dynamics of deserts and drought in the Sahel. Journal of the Real Meteorology Society. 101:193-202spa
dc.relation.referencesClark C. 1987. Deforestation and floods. Environmental Conservation. 14: 67–69.spa
dc.relation.referencesClark W, Jager J, Corell R, Kasperson R, McCarthy J, Cash D, Cohen S, Desanker P, Dickson N, Epstein P, Guston D, Hall J, Jaeger C, Janetos A, Leary N, Levy M, Luers A, MacCracken M, Melillo J, Moss R, Nigg J, Parry M, Parson E, Ribot J, Schellnhuber H, Seielstad G, Shea E, Vogel C, Wilbanks T. 2000. Assessing Vulnerability to Global Environmental Risks Report of the workshop on Vulnerability to Global Environmental Change: Challenges for Research, Assessment and Decision Making, Warrenton, VA. Research and Assessment Systems for Sustainability Program Discussion Paper 2000–12, Cambridge. 12 p.spa
dc.relation.referencesClifton A, Yoshida T, Chursinoff W. 1985. Regina Beach town landslide. Can Geotech , 1:60-68,spa
dc.relation.referencesComisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (Cepal). 2012. Valoración de daños y pérdidas. Ola invernal en Colombia, 2010-2011. Publicación de las Naciones Unidas. Bogotá: Misión BID - Cepal. 248pspa
dc.relation.referencesCrosta G. y Frattini P. 2008. Rainfall-induced landslides and debris flows. Hydrological Processes, 22: 473-477spa
dc.relation.referencesCrozier M, Gage M, Pettinga J, Selby M, Wasson R. 1992. The stability of hillslopes. En: Soons J. Selby M. (Eds.) Landforms of New Zealand. Longman Paul, Auckland, pp. 63– 90.spa
dc.relation.referencesDuque G. Amenazas naturales en los Andes de Colombia. 2007. Geografía del espacio rural colombiano. Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Bogotá 29p.spa
dc.relation.referencesEden D y Page M. 1998. Palaeoclimatic implications of a storm erosion record from late Holocene lake sediments, North Islands, New Zealand. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 139: 37–58.spa
dc.relation.referencesEtter A, McAlpine y Possingham H. 2008. A historical analysis of the spatial and temporal drivers of landscape change in Colombia since 1500. Annals of the American Association of Geographers. 98(1): 2-23.spa
dc.relation.referencesFAO, OIMT. 2006. Las mejores prácticas para fomentar la observancia de la ley en el sector forestal. Estudio FAO Montes. Roma. 142pspa
dc.relation.referencesFAO. 2010. Global Forest Resources Assessment 2010. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 58p.spa
dc.relation.referencesFAO. 1997. State of the World’s Forests 1997. FAO, Rome.spa
dc.relation.referencesFiloso S, Martinelli L, Howarth R, Boyer E, Dentener F. 2006. Human activities changing the nitrogen cycle in Brazil. Biogeochemistry 79:61-89.spa
dc.relation.referencesFisher B, Turner K, Zylstra M, Brouwer R, De Groot R, Farber S, Ferraro P, Green R, Hadley D, Harlow J, Jefferiss P, l Morling P, Mowatt S, Naidoo R, Paavola J, Strassburg B, Yu D y Balmford D. 2008. Ecosystem Services and Economic Theory: Integration for Policy-Relevant Research. Ecological Applications, 18 (8): 2050-2067.spa
dc.relation.referencesFoley J; DeFries R. Asner G, Barford C, Bonan G, Carpenter S, Chapin F, Coe M, Daily G, Gibbs H, Helkowski J, Holloway T, Howard E, Kucharik J, Monfreda C, Patz J, Prentice I, Ramankutty N, Snyder P. 2005. Global consequences of landuse. Science, 309: 570–574spa
dc.relation.referencesGarcia H. 2012. Deforestación en Colombia: Retos y perspectivas. FEDESARROLLO. 28pspa
dc.relation.referencesGlade T. 2003. Landslide occurrence as a response to land use change: a review of evidence from New Zealand. Catena 51: 297 – 314spa
dc.relation.referencesGonzález J, Etter A, Sarmiento A, Orrego S, Ramírez C, Cabrera E, Vargas D, Galindo G, García M, Ordoñez F. 2011. Análisis de tendencias y patrones espaciales de deforestación en Colombia. Instituto de Hidrología, Meteorología y Estudios Ambientales-IDEAM. Bogotá D.C. Colombia. 64 p.spa
dc.relation.referencesGrau H, y Aide M. 2008. Globalization and land-use transitions in Latin America. Ecology and Society 13(2): 16.spa
dc.relation.referencesGray D y Sotil R. 1996. Biotechnical and soil bioengineering slope stabilization, a practical guide for erosion control. Jhon Wiley & Sons Inc, New York, 381 p.spa
dc.relation.referencesGrunert J y Hardenbicker U. 1997. The frequency of landsliding in the north Rhine area and possible climatic implications. En: Matthews J, Brunsden D, Frenzel B., Gläser, B, Weiß M. (Eds.), Rapid Mass Movement as a Source of Climatic Evidence for the Holocene. Palaeoclimate Research, Stuttgart, 444 p.spa
dc.relation.referencesHamilton L y Pearce A. 1987. What are the soil and water benefits of planting trees in developing country watersheds? En: Sustainable Development of Natural Resources in the Third World. Eds. Southgate, D, USA, 58 p.spa
dc.relation.referencesHarmeling S. 2012. Global Climate Risk Index.German watchspa
dc.relation.referencesHenderson A, ChurchilL S y Luteyn J. 1991. Neotropical plant diversity. Nature, 351: 21-22.spa
dc.relation.referencesHewlett J y Bosch J .1984. The dependence of storm flows on rainfall intensity and vegetal cover in South Africa. Journal of Hydrology. 75: 365-381.spa
dc.relation.referencesHewlett J y Helvey J. 1970. Effects of forest clear felling on the storm hydrograph. Water Resources Research 6, No. 3: 768-782.spa
dc.relation.referencesHofer T. 1998. Do land use changes in the Himalayas affect downstream flooding? Traditional understanding and new evidences. Memoir Geological Society of India 19: 119-141.spa
dc.relation.referencesIbsen M y Brunsden, D. 1997. Mass movement and climatic variation on the south coast of Great Britain. En: Matthews J, Brunsden D, Frenzel B, Gläser B, Weiß M. (Eds.), Rapid Mass Movement as a Source of Climatic Evidence for the Holocene. Palaeoclimate Research, Stuttgart, 444 p.spa
dc.relation.referencesIGAC & CORPOICA. 2002. Zonificación de los conflictos de uso de las tierras en Colombia. 87 p.spa
dc.relation.referencesInstituto Geográfico Agustín Codazzi. 2010. Mapa división político – Administrativa de Colombia. Proyecto Sistema de Información Geográfica para la Planeación y el Ordenamiento Territorial, SIG-OT.spa
dc.relation.referencesInnes J. 1997. Historical debris-flow activity and climate in Scotland. En: Matthews J, Brunsden D, Frenzel B, Gläser B, Weiß M. (Eds.), Rapid Mass Movement as a Source of Climatic Evidence for the Holocene. Palaeoclimate Research. Stuttgart, 444 p.spa
dc.relation.referencesInstituto de Hidrología, Meteorología y Estudios Ambientales [Ideam] & Universidad Nacional de Colombia [UNAL].2005. Informe de evaluación del cambio climático en Colombia. Documento digital elaborado en el marco del contrato firmado entre Conservación Internacional [CI] Colombia y la Universidad Nacional de Colombia, sede Bogotá, Depto. de Geografía para el Ideam. Bogotá: Ideam. 62 pspa
dc.relation.referencesInstituto de Hidrología, Meteorología y Estudios Ambientales [Ideam]. 2010. Segunda Comunicación Nacional ante la Convención Marco de Naciones Unidas sobre el Cambio Climático. Bogotá, Colombia, 203pspa
dc.relation.referencesIves J y Messerli B.1989. The Himalayan dilemma. Reconciling development and conservation. London United Nations University Press. Tokyo. 272 p.spa
dc.relation.referencesIves J. 2004. Himalayan Perceptions: Environmental Change and the Well-Being of Mountain Peoples. The Journal of the Association for Nepal and Himalayan Studies. 25: 50-53.spa
dc.relation.referencesLieberman D, Lieberman M, Peralta R., Hartshorn G. 1996. Tropical Forest Structure and Composition on a Large-Scale Altitudinal Gradient in Costa Rica. Journal of Ecology 84:137-152.spa
dc.relation.referencesMaass J, Balvanera P, Castillo A, Daily G, Mooney H, Ehrlich P, Quesada M., Miranda A, Jaramillo V. 2005. Ecosystem services of tropical dry forests: insights from long-term ecological and social research on the Pacific Coast of Mexico. Ecology and Society, 10(1):17spa
dc.relation.referencesMinisterio de Ambiente, Vivienda y Desarrollo Territorial (MAVDT). 2004. Plan Nacional de Lucha contra la desertificación,spa
dc.relation.referencesMyers N, Mittermeier R A, Mittermeier C G, da Fonseca GAB, Ken T. 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403: 853–858.spa
dc.relation.referencesOlivero-Verbel, 2011. Colombia: Environmental Health Issues. Elsevier. 759 p.spa
dc.relation.referencesPielke R, Walko L, Steyaert P, Vidale G, Liston W. Lyons y Chase T. 1999. The influence of anthropogenic landscape changes on weather in South Florida, Mo. Wea. Review, 127:1663-1673.spa
dc.relation.referencesRestrepo A. 2005. Los sedimentos del río Magdalena. Reflejo de la crisis ambiental. Capítulo 2. Universidad EAFIT y Colciencias. Medellín. 231 p.spa
dc.relation.referencesRodolfi G. 1997. Holocene mass movement activity in the Tosco-Romagnolo Apennines (Italy). En: Matthews J, Brunsden D, Frenzel B, Gläser B, Weiß M. (Eds.), Rapid Mass Movement as a Source of Climatic Evidence for the Holocene. Palaeoclimate Research. 444 p.spa
dc.relation.referencesRowe R, Sharma N P, Bowder J. 1992. Deforestation: problems, causes and concern. En: Managing the world’s forest: looking for balance between conservation and development, ed. Sharma, N. P. 33-46.spa
dc.relation.referencesRudel T, Roper J. 1997. The paths to rain forest destruction: cross national Patterns of tropical deforestation. World Development, 25:53–65spa
dc.relation.referencesSokal R y Rohlf J. 1980. Introduccion a la bioestadistica. Reverte. España. 365 p.spa
dc.relation.referencesSuárez J. 1994. Activator Mechanisms of Landslides in Tropical Environments. International Conference on Landslides and Slope Stability. Kuala Lumpur Malaysia. 361 p.spa
dc.relation.referencesTrustrum N, Blaschke P, DeRose R, West, A. 1990. Regolith changes and pastoral productivity declines following deforestation in steep lands of North Island, New Zealand. Transactions 14th International Soil Science Congress. Japan, 130 p.spa
dc.relation.referencesTrustrum N y Page M. 1992. The long-term erosion history of Lake Tutira watershed: implications for sustainable land use management. The Proceedings of the International Conference on Sustainable Land Use Management, New Zealand, 215 p.spa
dc.relation.referencesUpadhyay T, Solberg B y Sankhayan P. 2006. Use of models to analyse landuse changes, forest/soil degradation and carbon sequestration with special reference to hymalayan region: Are view and analysis. Forest Policy and Economics, 9(4): 349 – 371spa
dc.relation.referencesUnidad Nacional para la Gestión del Riesgo y Desastres. 2012. Líneas estratégicas y avances en priorización de zonas de intervención. Bogotá, 31pspa
dc.relation.referencesVan Kooten G y Bulte E. 2000. The economics of nature: managing biological assets. Blackwells Publishers, Wageningen, 528 p.spa
dc.relation.referencesVitousek P. 1994. Beyond global warming: Ecology and global change. Ecological Society of America. 75(7): 1862-1876spa
dc.relation.referencesWang G. y Sassa K. 2003. Pore pressure generation and movement of rainfall-induced landslides: effects of grain size and fine particle content. Engineering Geology, 69:109-125.spa
dc.relation.referencesWassenaar T, Gerber P, Verburg P, Rosales M, Ibrahim M, Steinfeld H. 2007. Projecting land use changes in the neotropics: the geography of pasture expansion into forest. Global Environmental Change, 17:86–104spa
dc.relation.references72. World Resources Institute (WRI), 2001. Washington on the Edge. World Resource Institute, Washington D C.spa
dc.subject.proposalvariabilidad climáticaspa
dc.subject.proposalservicios ecosistémicosspa
dc.subject.proposalEventos de emergenciaspa
dc.publisher.grantorUniversidad Militar Nueva Granadaspa


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record