Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

El gobierno corporativo en el ámbito del sector público: un estudio bibliométrico en las revistas ubicadas en el área de Administración Pública

dc.creatorFlórez Parra, Jesús Mauricio
dc.date2016-12-06
dc.identifierhttps://revistas.unimilitar.edu.co/index.php/rfce/article/view/743
dc.identifier10.18359/rfce.743
dc.descriptionThis research focuses on a bibliometric study comprised between 2007-2015. The most relevant and significant themes are discussed, universities investigating the phenomenon of corporate governance (CG) in the public domain and magazines that address this issue. To this end 47 of the most prestigious journals and with international impact included in Public Administration were taken. The analysis of the results put on the relief CG implementation in the public sector in areas such as education, health and local government and the dominance exerted by the Anglo-Saxon culture through various academic journals of The Journal Citation Reports.en-US
dc.descriptionEsta investigación se centra en un estudio bibliométrico comprendido entre los años 2007-2015. Se analizan las temáticas más relevantes y significativas, las universidades que investigan el fenómeno del gobierno corporativo (GC) en el ámbito público y las revistas que abordan esta temática. Para este fin, se tomaron las 47 revistas de mayor prestigio e impacto internacional incluidas en Public Administration. El análisis de los resultados pone sobre el relieve la implementación del GC en el sector público en áreas como la educación, la sanidad o los gobiernos locales y el predominio que ejerce la cultura anglosajona a través de las diversas revistas académicas del Journal Citation Reports.es-ES
dc.descriptionEsta pesquisa se concentra num estudo bibliométrico realizado entre os anos 2007-2015. Analisam-se as temáticas mais relevantes e significativas, as universidades que pesquisam o fenômeno do governo corporativo (GC) no âmbito público e as revistas que abordam esta temática. Para este fim, tomaram-se as 47 revistas de maior prestígio e impacto internacional incluídas em Public Administration. A análise dos resultados destaca a implementação do GC no setor público em áreas como a educação, a previdência ou os governos locais e o predomínio que exerce a cultura anglo-saxã através das diversas revistas acadêmicas do Journal Citation Reports.pt-BR
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.formatapplication/xml
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherUniversidad Militar Nueva Granadaes-ES
dc.relationhttps://revistas.unimilitar.edu.co/index.php/rfce/article/view/743/2413
dc.relationhttps://revistas.unimilitar.edu.co/index.php/rfce/article/view/743/2767
dc.relation/*ref*/Academic Ranking of World Universities (AMRU) (2015). Shanghai. Recuperado el 16 de julio de 2016, de http://www.shanghairanking.com/es/ARWU2015.html
dc.relation/*ref*/Adut, D., Holder, A. & Robin, A. (2013). Predictive versus opportunistic earnings management, executive compensation, and firm performance. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 32(3), 126-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2013.02.007
dc.relation/*ref*/Bartki, H., Rivard, S. & Talbot, J. (1988). An Information Systems Keyword Classification Scheme. MIS Quarterly, 12(2), 299-322. https://doi.org/10.2307/248855
dc.relation/*ref*/Bordons, M. & Zulueta, Mª. (1999). Evaluación de la actividad científica a través de indicadores bibliométricos. Revista Espa-ola de Cardiología, (52)10, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0300-8932(99)75008-6
dc.relation/*ref*/Bozec, R., Zéghal, D. & Boujenoui, A. (2004). The effect of the reform of Canadian state-owned enterprises on major corporate governance mechanisms. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 63(2), 79-94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8500.2004.00380.x
dc.relation/*ref*/Braadbaart, O. & Yusnandarshah, B. (2008). Public Sector Benchmarking: a Survey of Scientific articles, 1990-2005. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 74(3), 421-433. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852308095311
dc.relation/*ref*/Cadbury, A. (1992). Informe de comité sobre los aspectos financieros del gobierno corporativo. Recuperado el 16 de junio de 2014, de http://www.ecgi.org/codes/documents/cadbury.pdf
dc.relation/*ref*/Carnegie, G. & Tuck, J. (2010). Understanding the ABC of University Governance. The Australian Journal of Public Administration, 69(4), 431–441. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8500.2010.00699.x
dc.relation/*ref*/Carver, J. (2010). A case for global governance theory: practitioners avoid it, academics narrow it, the world needs it. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18(2), 149–157. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2010.00785.x
dc.relation/*ref*/Cernat, L. (2004). The emerging European corporate governance model: Anglo-Saxon, Continental, or still the century of diversity? Journal of European Public Policy, 11(1), 147–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350176042000164343
dc.relation/*ref*/Christopher, J. (2015). Internal audit Does it enhance governance in the Australian public university sector? Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 43(6), 954-971. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143214543206
dc.relation/*ref*/Clatworthy, A., Mellett, J. & Peel, J. (2000). Corporate Governance under `New Public Management': an Exemplification. Corporate Governance, 8(2), 166-176 https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8683.00193
dc.relation/*ref*/Cuervo, A. (2002). Corporate Governance Mechanisms: a plea for less code of good governance and more market control. Corporate Governance, 10(2), 84-93 https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8683.00272
dc.relation/*ref*/Cuomo, F., Mallin, C. & Zattoni, A. (2016). Corporate Governance Codes: A Review and Research Agenda. Corporate governance: an international review, 24(3), 222-241. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12148
dc.relation/*ref*/Davis, J, Schoorman, F. & Donaldson, L. (1997). Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 2-47.
dc.relation/*ref*/De Boer, H., Enders, J. & Leisyte, L. (2007). Public sector reform in dutch higher education: the organizational transformation of the university. Public Administration, 85(1), 27–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00632.x
dc.relation/*ref*/Dent, M., Gestel, N. & Teelken, C. (2007). Symposium on Changing Modes of Governance in Public Sector Organizations: Action and Rhetoric. Public Administration, 85(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00630.x
dc.relation/*ref*/Donaldson, L. & Davis, J. (1991). Stewardship theory or agency theory: CEO governance and shareholder returns. Australian Journal of Management, 16, 49-64. https://doi.org/10.1177/031289629101600103
dc.relation/*ref*/Donaldson, T. & Preston, L. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65-91
dc.relation/*ref*/Durisin, B. & Puzone, F. (2009). Maturation of corporate governance research, 1993–2007: an assessment. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(3), 266-291. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2009.00739.x
dc.relation/*ref*/Durisin, B., Calabretta, G. & Parmeggiani, V. (2010). The Intellectual Structure of Product Innovation Research: A Bibliometric Study of the Journal of Product Innovation Management, 1984–2004. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27, 437-451. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2010.00726.x
dc.relation/*ref*/Ferlie, E., Ashburner, L. & Fitzgerald, L. (1995). corporate governance and the public sector: some issues and evidence from the NHS. Public Administration, 73(2), 375-392. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.1995.tb00834.x
dc.relation/*ref*/Flórez, J. (2013). El gobierno corporativo en el sector público: Un estudio en las universidades públicas espa-olas. Cuadernos de Administración, 29(50), 142-152.
dc.relation/*ref*/Flórez, J., López, M. & López, A. (2014a). El gobierno corporativo de las universidades: Estudio de las cien primeras universidades del ranking de Shanghái. Revista de Educación, 364, 170-196.
dc.relation/*ref*/Flórez, J., López, M. & López, A. (2014b). Gobierno corporativo y sector público: un estudio bibliométrico en las principales revistas ISI. Innovar, 24(51), 79-98. https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v24n51.41489
dc.relation/*ref*/Freeman, E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston: Pitman.
dc.relation/*ref*/Freeman, E. (1994). The politics of stakeholder theory: some future directions. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(4), 409-421. https://doi.org/10.2307/3857340
dc.relation/*ref*/Garand, J. C. (1990). An alternative interpretation of recent polticial science journal evaluations. Political Science and Politics, 23(3), 448-451. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096500033321
dc.relation/*ref*/Gómez, P. & Korine, H. (2005). Democracy and the evolution of corporate governance. Corporate Governance, 13(16), 739-752. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2005.00467.x
dc.relation/*ref*/Hacen, M. (2011). Antecedents of organizational innovation the diffusion of new public management into danish local government. Public Administration, 89(2), 285–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01855.x
dc.relation/*ref*/Hardman, B. (1996). Corporate governance: a practical guide for directors and secretaries. Australian Company Secretary, July, 235–242
dc.relation/*ref*/Haxhi, I., Ees, H. & Sorge, A. (2013). A political perspective on business elites and institutional embeddedness in the uk code‐issuing process. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 21(6), 535-546. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12036
dc.relation/*ref*/Ho, Chi-K. (2005). Corporate governance and corporate competitiveness: an international analysis. Corporate Governance, 13(2), 211-253. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2005.00419.x
dc.relation/*ref*/Hodges, R., Wright, M. & Keasey, K. (1996). Corporate governance in the public services: concepts and issues. Public Money and Management, 16(2), 7–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540969609387915
dc.relation/*ref*/Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3-19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.x
dc.relation/*ref*/Hooghiemstra, R. & Van Ees, H. (2011). Uniformity as response to soft law: evidence from compliance and non‐compliance with the Dutch corporate governance code. Regulation & Governance, 5(4), 480-498. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5991.2011.01118.x
dc.relation/*ref*/Howard, C. & Seth-Purdie, R. (2005). Governance Issues for Public Sector Boards. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 64(3), 56-68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8500.2005.00452.x
dc.relation/*ref*/James, O. (2001). Business Models and the Transfer of Businesslike Central Government Agencies. Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration, 14(2), 233-252. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0491.00159
dc.relation/*ref*/Jensen, M. & Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
dc.relation/*ref*/Journal Citation Reports (JCR) (2015). Institute for Scientific Information. Recuperado el 16 de julio de 2016, de http://biblioteca.ugr.es/pages/biblioteca_electronica/bases_datos/journal-citation-reportssocial-sciences
dc.relation/*ref*/Kellough, J. & Pitts, D. (2005). Who contributes to public administration review? Examining the charactristics of Authors Who Submit Manuscripts to the Journal. Public administration Review, 65(1), 3-7 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00425.x
dc.relation/*ref*/La Porta, R., Lopez-De-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A. & Vishny, R. (2000). Investor protection and corporate governance. Journal of Financial Economics, 58, 3-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(00)00065-9
dc.relation/*ref*/Lan, Z. & Anders, K. (2000). A paradigmatic view of contemporary public administration research: an empirical test. Administration and Society, 32(2), 138-165. https://doi.org/10.1177/00953990022019380
dc.relation/*ref*/Lazonick, W. & O'Sullivan, M. (2000). Maximizing shareholder value: a new ideology for corporate governance. Economy and Society, 29(1), 13-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/030851400360541
dc.relation/*ref*/Lee, J. & Vicente, J. (2005). Bibliometric analysis of human factors (1970–2000): a quantitative description of scientific impact. Human Factors, 47(4), 753–766. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872005775570970
dc.relation/*ref*/Legge, J. Jr. & Devore, J. (1987). Measuring Productivity in U.S. Public Administration and public Affair Programs 1981-1985. Administration and Society, 19(2), 147-156 https://doi.org/10.1177/009539978701900201
dc.relation/*ref*/Lokuwaduge, C. & Armstrong, A. (2015). The impact of governance on the performance of the higher education sector in Australia. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 43(5), 811-827. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143214535740
dc.relation/*ref*/Luan, Jung-Ch. & Tang, Je-m. (2007). Where is Independent Director Efficacy? Corporate Governance, 15(4), 636-643. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00593.x
dc.relation/*ref*/Nord, J. & Nord, G. (1995). MIS research: Journal status and analysis. Information and Management, 29(1), 29-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-7206(95)00010-T
dc.relation/*ref*/Organización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo Económico (OCDE) (2004). Principios del Gobierno Corporativo. Recuperado el 14 de octubre de 2014, de http://www.oecd.org/daf/ca/corporategovernanceprinciples/37191543.pdf
dc.relation/*ref*/Organización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo Económico (OCDE) (2005). Directrices sobre el Gobierno Corporativo de Empresas Públicas. Recuperado el 14 de octubre 2014, de http://www.ecgi.org/codes/documents/oecd_soe_en.pdf
dc.relation/*ref*/Plümber, T. & Radaelli, C. (2004). Publish or perish: publications and citations of italian political scientists in international political socience jornals, 1990-2002. Journal of European Public Policy, 11(6), 1112-1127. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350176042000298138
dc.relation/*ref*/Ramos-Rodríguez, A. & Ruíz-Navarro, J. (2004). Changes in the intellectual structure of strategic management research: a bibliometric study of the strategic management journal, 1980–2000. Strategic Management Journal, 25, 981–1004. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.397
dc.relation/*ref*/Rhodes, R. (1996). The new governance: governing without government. Political Studies, 44(4), 652-667. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb01747.x
dc.relation/*ref*/Rodgers, T., Freeman, R., Williams, J. & Kane, D (2011). Students and the governance of higher education: A UK perspective. Tertiary Education and Management, 17(3), 247-260 https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2011.586046
dc.relation/*ref*/Ryan, C. & Ng, W. (2000). Public sector corporate governance disclosures: an examination of annual reporting practices in Queensland. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 59(2), 11-23. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.00148
dc.relation/*ref*/Ryan, C., Stanley, T. & Nelson, M. (2002). Accountability disclosures by queensland local government councils: 1997-1999. Financial Accountability & Management, 18(3), 261-289. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0408.00153
dc.relation/*ref*/Stewart, J. Asha, F. Shulman, A. & Ng, C. (2012). Governance disclosure on the internet: the case of australian state government departments. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 71(4), 440–456. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8500.2012.00789.x
dc.relation/*ref*/Taylor, M. (2013). Shared governance in the modern university. Higher Education Quarterly, 67(1), 80-94. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12003
dc.relation/*ref*/Veronesi, G. & Keasey, K. (2010). NHS boards: knowing the 'what' but not the 'how'. Public Money & Management, 30(6), 363-370. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2010.525005
dc.relation/*ref*/Weimer, J. & Pape, J. (1999). A taxonomy of systems of corporate governance. Corporate Governance, 7(2), 152-166. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8683.00143
dc.relation/*ref*/Wellens, L. & Jegers, M. (2011). Beneficiaries' participation in nonprofit organizations: a theory-based approach. Public Money & Management, 31(3), 175-182. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2011.573227
dc.relation/*ref*/Whiteoak, J. (1996). Corporate governance—why local government should manage its own agenda. Public Money & Management, 16(2), 23-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540969609387917
dc.rightsDerechos de autor 2016 Revista Facultad de Ciencias Económicases-ES
dc.sourceRevista Facultad de Ciencias Económicas; Vol. 25 No. 1 (2017); 161-175en-US
dc.sourceRevista Facultad de Ciencias Económicas; Vol. 25 Núm. 1 (2017); 161-175es-ES
dc.sourceRevista Facultad de Ciencias Económicas; v. 25 n. 1 (2017); 161-175pt-BR
dc.source1909-7719
dc.source0121-6805
dc.subjectCorporate governanceen-US
dc.subjectpublic sectoren-US
dc.subjectinternational journalsen-US
dc.subjectbibliometricsen-US
dc.subjecttransparencyen-US
dc.subjectGobierno corporativoes-ES
dc.subjectsector públicoes-ES
dc.subjectrevistas internacionaleses-ES
dc.subjectbibliométricoes-ES
dc.subjecttransparenciaes-ES
dc.subjectGoverno corporativopt-BR
dc.subjectsetor públicopt-BR
dc.subjectrevistas internacionaispt-BR
dc.subjectbibliometriapt-BR
dc.subjecttransparênciapt-BR
dc.titleCorporate governance in the field of public sector: a bibliometric study in magazines located in the area of public administrationen-US
dc.titleEl gobierno corporativo en el ámbito del sector público: un estudio bibliométrico en las revistas ubicadas en el área de Administración Públicaes-ES
dc.titleO governo corporativo no âmbito do setor público: um estudo bibliométrico nas revistas localizadas na área de administração públicapt-BR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Archivos en el ítem

ArchivosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay archivos asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem