Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKottow, Miguel
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-08T19:31:27Z
dc.date.available2020-01-08T19:31:27Z
dc.date.issued2015-07-15
dc.identifierhttp://revistas.unimilitar.edu.co/index.php/rlbi/article/view/532
dc.identifier10.18359/rlbi.532
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10654/34079
dc.descriptionTeaching bioethics loses touch with social reality in which are practiced from its field (medicine, biomedical research, public health). Its practical reflection becomes simplified on principles, dogmas, and even decisional algorithms. The original discourse about the moral purification of the clinical encounter, the patient-physician relationship, and tester –researcher led by decisions, lose relevance since these practices have been distorted by the impersonal biomedical effect.On the other hand, bioethics has embarked on the current global discourse, where good intentions and humanitarian views collide with the ongoing Realpolitik that increases inequality, environmental degradation, and civil insecurity. Ethics has to regain its proximal approach, mediating between the theory and the practices with a discourse to the real problems and enough severity to have a hand in its social background.eng
dc.descriptionLa enseñanza de la bioética pierde contacto con la realidad social en la cual se ejercen las actividades de su ámbito (medicina, investigación biomédica, salud pública). Su reflexión práctica se vuelve esquemática y cortocircuitada en principios y dogmas, incluso proponiendo modos algorítmicos de decisión. El original discurso sobre la depuración moral del encuentro clínico, la relación paciente-médico y probando-investigador comandados por decisiones informadas pierde relevancia por cuanto estas práctica se han distorsionado por efecto de la biomedicina impersonal.Por otro lado, la bioética se deja seducir por el lenguaje holístico de la ética global, adhiriendo al coro de buenas intenciones que se estrellan con una realipolitik que permite el aumento de inequidades, el deterioro ambiental, la inseguridad ciudadana. La ética debe recuperar su enfoque proximal, intermediando entre la teoría y las prácticas con un discurso atingente a los problemas reales y de suficiente rigor como para influir sobre su entorno social.spa
dc.descriptionO ensino da bioética perde o contato com a realidade social na qual as atividades do seu domínio (medicina, investigação biomédica, saúde pública) são exercidas. Sua reflexão prática torna-se esquemática e curto-circuitada em princípios e dogmas, mesmo propondo modos algorítmicos de decisão. O discurso original sob a depuração moral do encontro clínico, a relação médico-paciente e testado-pesquisador, liderados por decisões informadas perdem relevância porque estas práticas foram distorcidas devido à biomedicina impessoal.Por outro lado, a bioética é seduzida pela linguagem holística da ética global, aderindo ao coro de boas intenções que se chocam com uma realipolitik que permite o aumento de desigualdades, a degradação ambiental, a insegurança cidadã. A ética deve recuperar a sua abordagem proximal, mediando entre a teoria e as práticas com um discurso atinente para os problemas reais e de rigor suficiente como para influenciar seu ambiente social.por
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherUniversidad Militar Nueva Granadaspa
dc.rightsDerechos de autor 2016 Revista Latinoamericana de Bioéticaspa
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0spa
dc.sourceRevista Latinoamericana de Bioética; Vol. 15 Núm. 29-2 (2015): Bioética, proximidad e investigación; 14-25spa
dc.source2462-859X
dc.source1657-4702
dc.titleThe teaching of a proximal bioethicseng
dc.titleLa enseñanza de una bioética proximalspa
dc.titleO ensino de uma bioética proximalpor
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.relation.referenceshttp://revistas.unimilitar.edu.co/index.php/rlbi/article/view/532/297
dc.relation.references/*ref*/•Álvarez, J. F. (2014). El individualismo ético como defensa de la igualdad. Isegoría, 50, 225-241.
dc.relation.references/*ref*/•Armstrong, D. (2014). Actors, patients and agency: a recent history. Sociology of Health and Disease, 36(2), 163-174.
dc.relation.references/*ref*/•Arras, J.D. y Fenton, E.M. (2009). Bioethics and human rights: access to health-related goods. Hastings Center Report, 39(5), 27-38.
dc.relation.references/*ref*/•Bosk, C.L. (1999). Professional ethicist available: logical, secular, friendly. Daedalus, 138(4), 47-68.
dc.relation.references/*ref*/•Boyle, J. (2003). Enclosing the genome: what the squabbles over genetic patients could teach us. Recuperado el 20 de febrero de 2015, de http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/1.0
dc.relation.references/*ref*/•Chatterjee, D. K. (ed.) 2004. The Ethics of Assistance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.references/*ref*/•Childress, J. F. (1990). The place of autonomy in bioethics. Hastings Center Report, 20(1), 12-17.
dc.relation.references/*ref*/•Compagnon, C.y Sannié, T. (2012). L’hopital. Un monde sans pitié. Paris: l’Éditeur.
dc.relation.references/*ref*/•Cortina, A. (1992). Ética comunicativa. En V. Campos, O. Guariglia y F. Salmerón (Eds.), Concepciones de la ética (pp. 177-199). Madrid: Trotta.
dc.relation.references/*ref*/•Cortina, A. (1995). Razón comunicativa y responsabilidad solidaria (3ra. edición). Salamanca: Sígueme
dc.relation.references/*ref*/•Crossley, N. y Roberts, M. (2004). After Habermas. Oxford, Malden: Blackwell Publishing.
dc.relation.references/*ref*/•Escríbar, A. (2013). Ética narrativa: antecedentes y posibles aportes al juicio moral. Santiago de Chile: Ediciones Universidad Diego Portales.
dc.relation.references/*ref*/•Fox, R.C. (1999). Is medical education asking too much of bioethics? Daedalus, 128(4), 1-25.
dc.relation.references/*ref*/•Fuenzalida-Puelma, H. y Connor, S.S. (1989). El derecho a la salud en las Américas. Wshington D.C.: Organización Panamericana de la Salud, Organización Mundial de la Salud.
dc.relation.references/*ref*/•Gómez Álvarez, J. E. (2014). La enseñanza de la bioética en licenciatura: anotaciones sobre una experiencia docente. Revista Latinoamericana de Bioética, 15(1), 100-107.
dc.relation.references/*ref*/•Giublini, A. y Minerva, F. (2012). After-birth abortion: why should the baby live? Journal of Medical Ethics, DOI:10.1136/medethics-2011-100411-
dc.relation.references/*ref*/•Hedgecoe, A.H. (2004). Critical bioethics: beyond the social science critique of applied ethics. Bioethics, 18(2), 120-143.
dc.relation.references/*ref*/•Hedgecoe, A. (2010). Bioethics and the reinforcement of socio-technical expectations. Social Studies of Science, 40(2), 163-186.
dc.relation.references/*ref*/•Hottois, G. (2007). ¿Qué es la bioética? Bogotá: Universidad El Bosque.
dc.relation.references/*ref*/•Keating, P. y Cambrosio, Al. (2003). Biomedical platforms. Cambridge, London: The MIT Press.
dc.relation.references/*ref*/•Kottow, M. (2007). Participación informada en clínica e investigación biomédica. Bogotá: Unesco, Universidad Nacional de Colombia.
dc.relation.references/*ref*/•Kottow, M. (2014). El Pa(de)ciente. Santiago de Chile: Ocho Libros.
dc.relation.references/*ref*/•López. J. (2004). How sociology can save bioethics…maybe. Sociology of Health and Illness, 26(7), 875-896.
dc.relation.references/*ref*/•Lepenies, W. (1985). Die drei Kulturen. München: Carl Hanser Verlag. Miller, F.G. y Brody, H. (2003). A critique of clinical equipoise. Hastings Center Report, 33(3), 19-28.
dc.relation.references/*ref*/•Nussbaum, M.C. (2000). Cultivating humanity. Cambridge, London; Harvard University Press.
dc.relation.references/*ref*/•O’Neill, O. (2004). Global justice: whose obligations? En D. K. Chatterjee (Ed.), The ethics of assistance (pp. 242-259). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.references/*ref*/•Ooms, G. y Hammonds, R. (2010). Taking up Daniel’s challenge: the case for global health justice. Health and Human Rights, 12(1), 29-46.
dc.relation.references/*ref*/•Parsons, T. (1958). Definitions of health and illness in the light of American values and social structures. En R. G. Jaco (ed.), Patients, Physicians, and Illness (pp. 165-187). New York: Free Press.
dc.relation.references/*ref*/•Potter, V.R. (1971) Bioethics: Bridge to the Future. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
dc.relation.references/*ref*/•Reich, W. (1995). The word “bioethics”: the struggle over its earliest meanings. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 5(1), 19-34.
dc.relation.references/*ref*/•Rennie, S. y Mupenda, B. (2008). Living apart together: reflections on bioethics, global inequality and social justice. Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities
dc.relation.references/*ref*/•Rohdes, R. (2005). Rethinking research ethics. The American Journal of Bioethics, 5(1).
dc.relation.references/*ref*/•Rothman, D.J. (1991). Strangers at the bedside. New York: Basic Books.
dc.relation.references/*ref*/•Sebag, V. (2007). Droit et bioéthique. Bruxelles: Éditions Larcier. Seedhouse, D. y Lovett, L. (1992). Practical medical ethics. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
dc.relation.references/*ref*/•Small, H. (2013). The value of the humanities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
dc.relation.references/*ref*/•Varmus, H. (2003). Building a global culture of science. The Lancet.
dc.relation.references/*ref*/•Walters, L. (2003). The Birth and Youth of the Kennedy Institute of Ethics. En J. K. Walter, E. P. Klein (Eds.), The Story of Bioethcs (pp. 215-231). Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
dc.relation.references/*ref*/•Wiley. L.F. (2010). Mitigation/Adaptation and Health: Health Policymaking in the Global Response to Climate Change and Implications for Other Upstream Determinants. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 38(3), 629-639.
dc.relation.references/*ref*/•Yamin, A. E. y Gloppen, S. (2013). La lucha por los derechos de la salud. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI.
dc.subject.proposalAutonomyeng
dc.subject.proposalglobal ethicseng
dc.subject.proposalimpersonal medicineeng
dc.subject.proposalproximal bioethics.eng
dc.subject.proposalAutonomíaspa
dc.subject.proposalbioética proximalspa
dc.subject.proposalética globalspa
dc.subject.proposalmedicina impersonal.spa
dc.subject.proposalAutonomiapor
dc.subject.proposalbioética proximalpor
dc.subject.proposalética globalpor
dc.subject.proposalmedicina impessoal.por


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record