Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorBuitrago, Miguel Ricardo
dc.contributor.authorBuitrago, Miguel Ricardo
dc.contributor.authorRestrepo, Juliana
dc.coverage.spatialInstituto Nacional de Cancerología, Clínica de Marly, Clínica Shaiospa
dc.coverage.temporalJulio a septiembre de 2018spa
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-19T13:05:08Z
dc.date.available2020-08-19T13:05:08Z
dc.date.issued2018-11-20
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10654/35979
dc.description.abstractIntroducción: la adopción de la cirugía video-toracoscópica asistida por robot (RVATS por sus siglas en inglés) ha aumentado en el mundo de 3.4% en el año 2010 al 17.5% en el año 2015. A pesar de esto, en América Latina, la literatura se limita a una serie de 10 pacientes llevados a lobectomía con RVATS y un caso de timectomía con RVATS en Brasil. Métodos: una serie retrospectiva de todos los casos de RVATS realizados en Bogotá, Colombia desde el 2012. Un único cirujano de tórax (RB) realizó todas las cirugías en tres instituciones: Clínica de Marly, Fundación Clínica Shaio y el Instituto Nacional de Cancerología. Se incluyeron variables preoperatorias, intraoperatorias, postoperatorias y las variables del reporte de patología. Los pacientes se analizaron en 3 grupos. resecciones pulmonares, cirugías mediastinales y otros procedimientos. Se utilizaron métodos estadísticos descriptivos para reportar la mediana y el rango interquartilico (IQR por sus siglas en inglés) de la variables continuas y número y porcentaje para las variables categóricas. La asociación entre el tiempo operatorio total y el año de la cirugía se analizó con un modelo de regresión lineal Resultados: cuarenta y siete pacientes fueron tratados con resecciones pulmonares RVATS; 72.3% (n=34) de estos paceintes fueron llevados a lobectomía. La mediana de tiempo operatorio total fue de 220 (IQR: 200 a 250) minutos, 6.4% (n=3) presentaron complicaciones intraoperatorias y el diagnóstico histológico más frecuente fue adenocarcinoma (n=24, 51.1%). De 18 paciente tratados con cirugía mediastinal con RVATS, 50.0% (n=9) fueron timectomías, la mediana del tiempo operatorio total fue de 195.5 (IQR 131 a 221) minutos y dos pacientes (11.1%) presentaron complicaciones intraoperatorias. La regresión lineal para la asociación entre el tiempo operatorio total y el año de la cirugía mostró un reducción de 10.3 minutos por cada año (p=0.006) Conclusiones: esta es la segunda serie de RVATS publicada en América Latina y la primera publicada en Colombia, con resultados comparables a otros reportes.spa
dc.description.tableofcontentsTitle page........................... 1 Abstract............................. 2 Introduction....................... 3 Methods............................ 3 Results.............................. 5 Discussion........................ 7 References....................... 10 Figures............................. 16 Tables.............................. 16spa
dc.format.mimetypeapplicaction/pdfspa
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.titleCirugía torácica asistida por robot en Colombia: experiencia multi-institucionalspa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2*
dc.type.localTesis/Trabajo de grado - Monografía - Especializaciónspa
dc.description.abstractenglishBackground: Robotic assisted videothoracoscopic surgery (RVATS) adoption has increased worldwide from 3.4% in 2010 to 17.5% in 2015. However, in Latin America, the literature is limited to a report of a series of 10 patients who underwent RVATS lobectomy and one case report of an RVATS thymectomy from Brazil. Methods: This is a retrospective review of all RVATS performed in Bogotá Colombia since 2012. A single thoracic surgeon (RB) performed all the operations at three institutions: Clínica de Marly, Fundación Clínica Shaio and Instituto Nacional de Cancerología. Preoperative, intraoperative, postoperative and pathology report variables were included. Patients were analyzed in three groups: robotic RVATS pulmonary resections, RVATS mediastinal surgeries and other RVATS procedures. Descriptive statistics were used to report the median and interquartile range (IQR) of the continuous variables, and number and percentage were used to describe categorical variables. The association between total operative time and the year the surgery was analyzed using a linear regression model. Results: Forty-seven patients underwent RVATS pulmonary resections; 72.3% (n=34) of these patients underwent a RVATS lobectomy. The median total operative time was 220 (IQR: 200 to 250) minutes, 6.4% (n=3) had intraoperative complications, and the most frequent histologic diagnosis was adenocarcinoma (n=24, 51.1%). Of 18 patients who underwent RVATS mediastinal surgeries, 50.0% (n=9) had RVATS thymectomy, the median total operative time was 195.5 (IQR: 131 to 221) minutes and two patients (11.1%) had intraoperative complications. The linear regression model of the association between total operative time and the year the surgery showed a 10.3 minute reduction per year (P=0.006). Conclusions: This is the second series of RVATS published in Latin America and the first published in Colombia, with comparable perioperative results to other reports.spa
dc.title.translatedRobot-assisted thoracic surgery in Colombia: a multi-institutional initial experiencespa
dc.subject.keywordsROBOT-ASSISTED THORACOSCOPIC SURGERY (RATS)spa
dc.subject.keywordsVIDEO-ASSISTED THORACOSCOPIC SURGERY (VATS)spa
dc.subject.keywordsDA VINCI SURGICAL SYSTEMspa
dc.subject.keywordsTHORACIC SURGERYspa
dc.subject.keywordsPULMONARY ADENOCARCINOMAspa
dc.publisher.programCirugía Oncológicaspa
dc.creator.degreenameEspecialista en Cirugía Oncológicaspa
dc.subject.decsCANCER-CIRUGIAspa
dc.subject.decsONCOLOGIAspa
dc.subject.decsTORAX-CIRUGIAspa
dc.subject.decsCIRUGIA MINIMAMENTE INVASIVAspa
dc.subject.decsPROCEDIMIENTOS QUIRURGICOS ROBOTICOSspa
dc.description.degreelevelEspecializaciónspa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Medicinaspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesisspa
dc.rights.creativecommonsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalspa
dc.relation.references1. Fahim C, Hanna W, Waddell T, et al. Robotic-Assisted thoracoscopic surgery for lung resection: The first Canadian series. Can J Surg 2017;60:260-5.spa
dc.relation.references2. Wei B, Cerfolio RJ. Robotic Lobectomy and Segmentectomy: Technical Details and Results. Surg Clin North Am 2017;97:771-82.spa
dc.relation.references3. Terra RM, Araujo PH, Lauricella LL, et al. Robotic pulmonary lobectomy for lung cancer treatment: program implementation and initial experience. J Bras Pneumol 2016;42:185-90.spa
dc.relation.references4. da Silva RA, Zugai R, Bruno IR. Letter to the Editor: robotic thymectomy for myasthenia gravis. J Bras Pneumol 2011;37:694-6.spa
dc.relation.references5. Buitrago MR, Franco A. Lobectomía pulmonar toracoscópica asistida por robot. Rev Colomb Cir 2012;27:65.spa
dc.relation.references6. Oh DS, Reddy RM, Gorrepati ML, et al. Robotic-Assisted, Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic and Open Lobectomy: Propensity-Matched Analysis of Recent Premier Data. Ann Thorac Surg 2017;104:1733-40.spa
dc.relation.references7. Kent M, Wang T, Whyte R, et al. Open, video-assisted thoracic surgery, and robotic lobectomy: Review of a national database. Ann Thorac Surg 2014;97:236-42.spa
dc.relation.references8. Emmert A, Straube C, Buentzel J, et al. Robotic versus thoracoscopic lung resection: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017;96:e7633.spa
dc.relation.references9. Agzarian J, Fahim C, Shargall Y, et al. The Use of Robotic-Assisted Thoracic Surgery for Lung Resection: A Comprehensive Systematic Review. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016;28:182-92.spa
dc.relation.references10. Cao C, Manganas C, Ang SC, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis on pulmonary resections by robotic video-assisted thoracic surgery. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2012;1:3-10.spa
dc.relation.references11. Radkani P, Joshi D, Barot T, et al. Robotic video- assisted thoracoscopic lung resection for lung tumors: a community tertiary care center experience over four years. Surg Endosc 2016;30:619-24.spa
dc.relation.references12. YeX,XieL,ChenG,etal.Roboticthoracicsurgeryversus video-assisted thoracic surgery for lung cancer: A meta- analysis. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2015;21:409-14.spa
dc.relation.references13. Louie BE, Wilson JL, Kim S, et al. Comparison of Video- Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery and Robotic Approaches for Clinical Stage I and Stage II Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Using The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Database. Ann Thorac Surg 2016;102:917-24.spa
dc.relation.references14. Adams RD, Bolton WD, Stephenson JE, et al. Initial multicenter community robotic lobectomy experience: Comparisons to a national database. Ann Thorac Surg 2014;97:1893-8.spa
dc.relation.references15. Mungo B, Hooker CM, Ho JSY, et al. Robotic Versus Thoracoscopic Resection for Lung Cancer: Early Results of a New Robotic Program. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2016;26:243-8.spa
dc.relation.references16. Mahieu J, Rinieri P, Bubenheim M, et al. Robot- Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery versus Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery for Lung Lobectomy Can a Robotic Approach Improve Short-Term Outcomes and Operative Safety [abstract] - Mahieu. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016;64:354-62.spa
dc.relation.references17. Farivar AS, Cerfolio RJ, Vallières E, et al. Comparing robotic lung resection with thoracotomy and video- assisted thoracoscopic surgery cases entered into the society of thoracic surgeons database. Innovations (Phila) 2014;9:10-5.spa
dc.relation.references18. Yang HX, Woo KM, Sima CS, et al. Long-term survival based on the surgical approach to lobectomy for clinical stage i nonsmall cell lung cancer: Comparison of robotic, video-assisted thoracic surgery, and thoracotomy lobectomy. Ann Surg 2017;265:431-7.spa
dc.relation.references19. Park BJ. Robotic Lobectomy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Thorac Surg Clin 2014;24:157-62.spa
dc.relation.references20. Kneuertz PJ, D’Souza DM, Moffatt-Bruce SD, et al. Robotic lobectomy has the greatest benefit in patients with marginal pulmonary function. J Cardiothorac Surg 2018;13:56.spa
dc.relation.references21. Kass KS, Velez-Cubian FO, Zhang WW, et al. Effect of advanced age on peri-operative outcomes after robotic- assisted pulmonary lobectomy: Retrospective analysis of 287 consecutive cases. J Geriatr Oncol 2017;8:102-7.spa
dc.relation.references22. Dylewski MR, Ohaeto AC, Pereira JF. Pulmonary Resection Using a Total Endoscopic Robotic Video- Assisted Approach. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2011;23:36-42.spa
dc.relation.references23. Melfi FMA, Mussi A. Robotically Assisted Lobectomy: Learning Curve and Complications. Thorac Surg Clin 33. 2008;18:289-95.spa
dc.relation.references24. Veronesi G. Robotic thoracic surgery technical considerations and learning curve for pulmonary resection. Thorac Surg Clin 2014;24:135-41.spa
dc.relation.references25. Jang HJ, Lee HS, Park SY, et al. Comparison of the Early Robot-Assisted Lobectomy Experience to Video- Assisted Thoracic Surgery Lobectomy for Lung Cancer. Innovations 2011;6:305-10.spa
dc.relation.references26. Anderson CA, Hellan M, Falebella A, et al. Robotic- 35. assisted lung resection for malignant disease. Innovations (Phila) 2007;2:254-8.spa
dc.relation.references27. Velez-Cubian FO, Ng EP, Fontaine JP, et al. Robotic- 36. Assisted Videothoracoscopic Surgery of the Lung. Cancer Control 2015;22:314-25.spa
dc.relation.references28. Yamashita S, Yoshida Y, Iwasaki A. Robotic surgery for thoracic disease. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016;22:1-5.spa
dc.relation.references29. Yang SM, Kuo S, Lee J. Robot-assisted thoracoscopic bronchoplasty. J Vis Surg 2015;1:20.spa
dc.relation.references30. Lazar JF, Posner DH, Palka W, et al. Robotically assisted bilateral bronchoplasty for tracheobronchomalacia. 38. Innovations (Phila) 2015;10:428-30.spa
dc.relation.references31. Jun Y, Hao L, Demin L, et al. Da Vinci robot-assisted system for thymectomy: experience of 55 patients in 39. China. Int J Med Robot 2014;10:294.spa
dc.relation.references32. Weksler B, Tavares J, Newhook TE, et al. Robot-assisted thymectomy is superior to transsternal thymectomy. Surg 40. Endosc 2012;26:261-6.spa
dc.relation.references33. Renaud S, Santelmo N, Renaud M, et al. Robotic-assisted thymectomy with da Vinci II versus sternotomy in the surgical treatment of non-thymomatous myasthenia gravis: Early results. Rev Neurol (Paris) 2013;169:30-6.spa
dc.relation.references34. Seong YW, Kang CH, Choi JW, et al. Early clinical outcomes of robot-assisted surgery for anterior mediastinal mass: Its superiority over a conventional sternotomy approach evaluated by propensity score matching. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2014;45:e68-73.spa
dc.relation.references35. Kang CH, Hwang Y, Lee HJ, et al. Robotic Thymectomy in Anterior Mediastinal Mass : Propensity Score Matching Study With. Ann Thorac Surg 2016;102:895-901.spa
dc.relation.references36. Fok M, Bashir M, Harky A, et al. Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Versus Robotic-Assisted Thoracoscopic Thymectomy: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Innovations (Phila) 2017;12:259-64.spa
dc.relation.references37. Buentzel J, Straube C, Heinz J, et al. Thymectomy via open surgery or robotic video assisted thoracic surgery. Can a recommendation already be made? Medicine (Baltimore) 2017;96:e7161.spa
dc.relation.references38. Buentzel J, Heinz J, Hinterthaner M, et al. Robotic versus thoracoscopic thymectomy: The current evidence. Int J Med Robot 2017;13:1-6.spa
dc.relation.references39. Straughan DM, Fontaine JP, Toloza EM. Robotic-assisted videothoracoscopic mediastinal surgery. Cancer Control 2015;22:326-30.spa
dc.relation.references40. Weissenbacher A, Bodner J. Robotic Surgery of the Mediastinum. Thorac Surg Clin 2010;20:331-9.spa
dc.subject.proposalCIRUGIA TORACOSCOPICA ASISTIDA POR ROBOTspa
dc.subject.proposalCIRUGIA TORACOSCOPICA ASISTIDA POR VIDEOspa
dc.subject.proposalSISTEMA DA VINCIspa
dc.subject.proposalCIRUGIA DE TORAXspa
dc.subject.proposalADENOCARCINOMA DE PULMONspa
dc.publisher.grantorUniversidad Militar Nueva Granadaspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1f*
dc.type.hasversioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionspa
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad Militar Nueva Granadaspa
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad Militar Nueva Granadaspa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repository.unimilitar.edu.cospa
dc.rights.localAcceso abiertospa
dc.coverage.sedeMedicinaspa


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/