Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCifuentes Vargas, Wendy Isabel
dc.coverage.spatialColombiaspa
dc.coverage.spatialEspañaspa
dc.coverage.temporal2008 - 2018spa
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-05T20:04:04Z
dc.date.available2020-10-05T20:04:04Z
dc.date.issued2020-06-09
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10654/36481
dc.description.abstractLa innovación es considerada como un factor importante para el crecimiento económico, dada sus aportes en la optimización de procesos, reducción de costos de producción, fomento de la investigación, reconocimiento de marca y posicionamiento en el mercado, para conocer el estado de innovación de Colombia frente a España, a través del documento se contrastaran tres variables: Volumen en el registro de patentes, Inversión del PIB en Investigación y Desarrollo y finalmente resultados históricos del Indice Global de Innovación, los resultados identificaran aspectos interesantes desarrollados a partir del análisis de variables por si mismas y combinadas, entre los cuales, que la relación entre volumen de registro de patentes de cada país es directa con el PIB destinado a Investigación y Desarrollo, también se desarrollara el argumento de porque el registro de patentes por si mismo no explica grandes avances en innovación, según los resultado de los datos, también se concluye que para que Colombia llegue a ser un país líder en innovación en la región debe emprender diversas estrategias que contribuyan a este fin.spa
dc.format.mimetypeapplicaction/pdfspa
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.titleAvance en innovación de la economía colombiana frente a la economía española 2008 – 2018spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.subject.lembECONOMIA - COLOMBIAspa
dc.subject.lembECONOMIA - ESPAÑAspa
dc.subject.lembPATENTES DE INVENCIONspa
dc.type.localTesis/Trabajo de grado - Monografía - Pregradospa
dc.description.abstractenglishInnovation is considered an important factor for economic growth, it contributes to have better optimization process, companies invests less costs in their production, Innovation promotes the research and generates brand recognition and positioning in the market, to know the state of innovation in Colombia. v.s Spain, through the document three variables will be contrasted: Volume in the patents registers, GDP in Research and Development and finally historical results of the Global Index of Innovation, the results will identify interesting aspects developed from the analysis of variables by themselves and combined, among which, that the relationship between the volume of patent registration of each country is direct with the GDP destined to Research and Development, the argument of why the patent registration by itself does not explain great innovation advances, also if Colombia want to become a leading country in innovation in the region must undertake several strategies that contribute to this goal.spa
dc.title.translatedInnovation progress in colombian economy vs. spanish economy 2008 - 2018spa
dc.subject.keywordsInnovationspa
dc.subject.keywordsColombiaspa
dc.subject.keywordsSpainspa
dc.subject.keywordsPatentsspa
dc.subject.keywordsGlobal Index of Innovationspa
dc.subject.keywordsInvestmentspa
dc.publisher.programEconomíaspa
dc.creator.degreenameEconomistaspa
dc.description.degreelevelPregradospa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Ciencias Económicasspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesisspa
dc.rights.creativecommonsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalspa
dc.relation.referencesAghion, P., & Howitt, P. (1990). A Model of Growth Through Creative Destruction. Cambridge, MA. https://doi.org/10.3386/w3223spa
dc.relation.referencesAhuja, G., & Katila, R. (2001). Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: a longitudinal study. Strategic Management Journal, 22(3), 197–220. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.157spa
dc.relation.referencesBarroso, W., Quoniam, L., & Pacheco, E. (2009). Patents as technological information in Latin America. World Patent Information, 31(3), 207–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wpi.2008.11.006spa
dc.relation.referencesBostan, I., & Spatareanu, M. (2018). Financing innovation through minority acquisitions. International Review of Economics and Finance, 57, 418–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2018.02.007spa
dc.relation.referencesCoe, D. T., Helpman, E., & Hoffmaister, A. W. (2009). International R&D spillovers and institutions. European Economic Review, 53(7), 723–741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2009.02.005spa
dc.relation.referencesDeardorff, A. V. (1992). Welfare Effects of Global Patent Protection. Economica, 59(233), 35. https://doi.org/10.2307/2555064spa
dc.relation.referencesDutta, S., Lanvin, B., & Wunsch-Vincent, S. (2018). Global innovation index 2018: energizing the world with innovation. Retrieved from https://books.google.com/books?hl=es&lr=&id=AuRjDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA3&dq=Global+Innovation+Index+2018&ots=aWM89o0sax&sig=adILjRcDjycD0quRqqGqI8GXyOEspa
dc.relation.referencesFernández-Sastre, J., & Montalvo-Quizhpi, F. (2019). The effect of developing countries’ innovation policies on firms’ decisions to invest in R&D. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 143, 214–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.02.006spa
dc.relation.referencesGómez Caridad, I., Sancho Lozano, R., Bordons, M., & Fernández Muñoz, M. (2006). La I+D en España a través de publicaciones y patentes. (J. Sebastian & E. Muñoz, Eds.), Radiografía de la investigación pública en España. Biblioteca Nuevaspa
dc.relation.referencesHurtado, R. E. G. (2018). Patent analysis of Colombian technological innovation 1991-2013. Investigacion Bibliotecologica, 32(77), 133–150. https://doi.org/10.22201/iibi.24488321xe.2018.77.57859spa
dc.relation.referencesJ. Acs, Z., & Audretsch, D. B. (1989). Patents as a Measure of Innovative Activity. Kyklos, 42(2), 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6435.1989.tb00186.xspa
dc.relation.referencesJuliao Rossi, J. L., Aguirre, F. B., Schmutzler, J., & Sánchez Manchola, I. D. (2013). Relationship between company innovation strategy and the decision to patent: Empirical evidence from Colombian manufacturing companies. Estudios Gerenciales, 29(128), 313–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.estger.2013.09.005spa
dc.relation.referencesJürgens, B., & Herrero-Solana, V. (2016). Patents from Latin America and Spain with Latipat: Country coverage and ability to search for emerging topics like Nanotechnology. World Patent Information, 46, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wpi.2016.05.003spa
dc.relation.referencesKim, S. Y., & Lee, H. J. (2019). The effect of patent acquisition on subsequent patenting activity. World Patent Information, 59, 101933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wpi.2019.101933spa
dc.relation.referencesKürtössy, J. (2004). Innovation indicators derived from patent data. Periodica Polytechnica Social and Management Sciences (Vol. 12). Retrieved from https://pp.bme.hu/so/article/view/1661spa
dc.relation.referencesKwon, S. (2020). How does patent transfer affect innovation of firms? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 154, 119959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119959spa
dc.relation.referencesOrganisation for Economic Co-operation. (2018). Oslo Manual 2018: Guidelines for collecting, reporting and using data on innovationspa
dc.relation.referencesScherer, F. M. (1986). Innovation and Growth: Schumpeterian Perspectives. MIT Press Books, 1spa
dc.relation.referencesSchumpeter, J. (1912). The theory of economic development (Tenth printing 2004). New Brunswickspa
dc.relation.referencesSchumpeter, J. A. (1947). Theoretical Problems: Theoretical Problems of Economic Growth. The Journal of Economic History. Cambridge University PressEconomic History Association. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022050700065189spa
dc.relation.referencesShepherd, W., & Shepherd, J. (2003). The economics of industrial organization. Retrieved from https://books.google.com.co/books?hl=es&lr=&id=DXAfAAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR3&dq=The+Economics+of+Industrial+Organization+sheppard&ots=bO0wLfok8M&sig=BIH16z3T48Z9WzaQo0g1pHnUTu4spa
dc.relation.referencesZachariadis, M. (2003). R&D, innovation, and technological progress: a test of the Schumpeterian framework without scale effects. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue Canadienne D`Economique, 36(3), 566–586. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5982.t01-2-00003spa
dc.subject.proposalInnovaciónspa
dc.subject.proposalColombiaspa
dc.subject.proposalEspañaspa
dc.subject.proposalPatentesspa
dc.subject.proposalIndice Global de Innovaciónspa
dc.subject.proposalInversiónspa
dc.publisher.grantorUniversidad Militar Nueva Granadaspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1f*
dc.type.hasversioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionspa
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad Militar Nueva Granadaspa
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad Militar Nueva Granadaspa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repository.unimilitar.edu.cospa
dc.rights.localAcceso abiertospa
dc.coverage.sedeCalle 100spa
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/