Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.advisorGomez Ibañez, Lucas
dc.contributor.authorGuzman Cortés, Jhordan
dc.contributor.authorPrado Reina, Andres Felipe
dc.coverage.spatialhospital universitario clinica san rafaelspa
dc.coverage.temporalenero - julio 2019spa
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-28T15:49:13Z
dc.date.available2022-02-28T15:49:13Z
dc.date.issued2022-02-01
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10654/40245
dc.description.abstractObjetivo. La apendicectomía laparoscópica(Ap-L) demostró efectos favorables en las tasas de complicaciones postquirúrgicas. En un Hospital Universitario se comparó la tasa de Infecciones de Sitios Operatorios (ISO) en pacientes con apendicitis aguda. Metodología. Con un diseño de corte transversal utilizando datos de registros clínicos de pacientes apendicectomizados por el servicio de Cirugía General, entre enero-julio/2019 en el Hospital Universitario Clínica San Rafael, se describieron características demográficas y clínicas, se comparó la tasa y el riesgo de ISO (Odds Ratio, OR IC95%) y características asociadas en pacientes con Ap-L Vs apendicectomía abierta(Ap-A). Resultados. Se incluyeron 179 pacientes con edad mediana de 34 años, la mayoría mujeres(53.1%), con Ap-A(64.8%). El porcentaje de neutrófilos (83%) y la frecuencia de apéndices en estado edematoso fue mayor en pacientes con Ap-L(30.2%) (Valor p:<0.05). La tasa de ISO fue mayor en pacientes con Ap-A(31.9%; OR: 3.72, 1.59-9.61), adicionalmente, la estancia hospitalaria fue mayor en pacientes con ISO (Valor p:<0.001). El riesgo de ISO en pacientes con Ap-A se asoció directamente al porcentaje de neutrófilos(OR: 1.052, 1.011-1.094) y a la presencia de apendicitis perforadas(OR: 5.594, 2.620-11.94). Conclusión La apendicetomía por laparoscopia se asoció menos riesgo de infección del sitio operatorio. El realizar un abordaje abierto con recuento alto de neutrófilos y hallazgos intraoperatorios de apendicitis aguda perforada fueron características clínicas asociadas a un mayor riesgo de ISO. No se encontraron diferencias entre estancia hospitalaria entre ambos abordajes, pero este si aumenta con la presencia de ISO independiente del abordaje escogidospa
dc.format.mimetypeapplicaction/pdfspa
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.titleFrecuencia de complicaciones post-apendicectomías laparoscópica Vs abierta en adultos con apendicitis aguda atendidos en el Hospital Universitario Clínica San Rafael, enero-julio/2019spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.type.localTesis/Trabajo de grado - Monografía - Especializaciónspa
dc.description.abstractenglishAbstract Background Acute appendicitis is a common presentation of surgical admissions imposing a significant burden on healthcare costs and resources. Laparoscopic appendectomy reduces the rate of surgical site infections and reduces the hospital stay. Target. Laparoscopic appendectomy (Ap-L) demonstrated favorable effects on postoperative complication rates. In a University Hospital, the rate of Surgical Site Infections (ISO) in patients with acute appendicitis was compared. Methods With a cross-sectional design using data from clinical records of patients undergoing appendectomy by the General Surgery service, between January-July/2019 at the Hospital Universitario Clínica San Rafael, demographic and clinical characteristics were described, the rate and risk of appendicitis were compared. ISO (Odds Ratio, OR CI95%) and associated characteristics in patients with Ap-L Vs open appendectomy (Ap-A). Results A total of 179 patients with a median age of 34 years were included, most of them women (53.1%), with Ap-A (64.8%). The percentage of neutrophils (83%) and the frequency of edematous appendages were higher in patients with Ap-L (30.2%) (p value: <0.05). The ISO rate was higher in patients with Ap-A (31.9%; OR: 3.72, 1.59-9.61), additionally, the hospital stay was longer in patients with ISO (P value: <0.001). The risk of ISO in patients with Ap-A was directly associated with the percentage of neutrophils (OR: 1052, 1011-1094) and the presence of perforated appendicitis (OR: 5594, 2620-11.94). Conclusion Laparoscopic appendectomy was associated with a lower risk of surgical site infection as well as a shorter hospital stay. Intraoperative findings of acute perforated appendicitis and high neutrophil count were clinical features associated with an increased risk of SSI.spa
dc.title.translatedFrequency of post-laparoscopic versus open appendectomy complications in adults with acute appendicitis treated at the Hospital Universitario Clínica San Rafael, January-July/2019spa
dc.subject.keywordsappendectomyspa
dc.subject.keywordscomplicationsspa
dc.publisher.programCirugía Generalspa
dc.creator.degreenameEspecialista en Cirugía Generalspa
dc.subject.decsAPENDICITISspa
dc.subject.decsAPENDICECTOMIAspa
dc.subject.decsLAPAROSCOPIAspa
dc.subject.decsCIRUGIA GENERALspa
dc.description.degreelevelEspecializaciónspa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Medicinaspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesisspa
dc.rights.creativecommonsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalspa
dc.relation.references1. Fenyö G. Routine use of a scoring system for decision-making in suspected acute appendicitis in adults. Acta Chir Scand. 1987 Sep;153(9):545-51.spa
dc.relation.references2. Fortea-Sanchis C, Martínez-RamosD, Escrig-Sos J, Daroca-José JM, Paiva-Coronel GA, Queralt-Martín R, et al. Apendicectomía laparoscópica frente al abordaje abierto para el tratamiento de la apendicitis aguda. Revista de Gastroenterología de México. 2012;77(2):76-81.spa
dc.relation.references3. Wagner JM, McKinney WP, Carpenter JL. Does this patient have appendicitis? JAMA. 1996 Nov 20;276(19):1589-94.spa
dc.relation.references4. Corneille MG, Steigelman MB, Myers JG, Jundt J, Dent DL, Lopez PP, et al. Laparoscopic appendectomy is superior to open appendectomy in obese patients. Am J Surg. 2007 Dec;194(6):877-80; discussion 880-1. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.08.043.spa
dc.relation.references5. Li X, Zhang J, Sang L, Zhang W, Chu Z, Li X, et al. Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy--a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Gastroenterol. 2010 Nov 3;10:129. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-10-129.spa
dc.relation.references6. Wei B, Qi CL, Chen TF, Zheng ZH, Huang JL, Hu BG, et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute appendicitis: a metaanalysis. Surg Endosc. 2011 Apr;25(4):1199-208. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1344-z.spa
dc.relation.references7. Addiss DG, Shaffer N, Fowler BS, Tauxe RV. The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States. Am J Epidemiol. 1990 Nov;132(5):910-25. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115734.spa
dc.relation.references8. Ohmann C, Franke C, Kraemer M, Yang Q. Neues zur Epidemiologie der akuten Appendizitis [Status report on epidemiology of acute appendicitis]. Chirurg. 2002 Aug;73(8):769-76. German. doi: 10.1007/s00104-002-0512-7.spa
dc.relation.references9. McBurney C. IV. The Incision Made in the Abdominal Wall in Cases of Appendicitis, with a Description of a New Method of Operating. Ann Surg. 1894 Jul;20(1):38-43. doi: 10.1097/00000658-189407000-00004.spa
dc.relation.references10. Jaschinski T, Mosch CG, Eikermann M, Neugebauer EA, Sauerland S. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Nov 28;11(11):CD001546. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001546.pub4.spa
dc.relation.references11. Ohmann C, Yang Q, Franke C. Diagnostic scores for acute appendicitis. Abdominal Pain Study Group. Eur J Surg. 1995 Apr;161(4):273-81.spa
dc.relation.references12. Andersson RE, Hugander AP, Ghazi SH, Ravn H, Offenbartl SK, Nyström PO, et al. Diagnostic value of disease history, clinical presentation, and inflammatory parameters of appendicitis. World J Surg. 1999 Feb;23(2):133-40. doi: 10.1007/pl00013174spa
dc.relation.references13. Larrachea P, Korn O. Laparoscopía diagnóstica en la sospecha de apendicitis aguda / Diagnostic laparoscopy in acute apendicitis. Rev. Chil. Cir. 2000;52(3):227-34.spa
dc.relation.references14. Alvarado A. A practical score for the early diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Ann Emerg Med. 1986 May;15(5):557-64. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(86)80993-3.spa
dc.relation.references15. Kularatna M, Lauti M, Haran C, MacFater W, Sheikh L, Huang Y, et al. Clinical Prediction Rules for Appendicitis in Adults: Which Is Best? World J Surg. 2017 Jul;41(7):1769-1781. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-3926-6.spa
dc.relation.references16. Coleman JJ, Carr BW, Rogers T, Field MS, Zarzaur BL, Savage SA, et al. The Alvarado score should be used to reduce emergency department length of stay and radiation exposure in select patients with abdominal pain. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018 Jun;84(6):946-950. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001885.spa
dc.relation.references17. Bhangu A, Søreide K, Di Saverio S, Assarsson JH, Drake FT. Acute appendicitis: modern understanding of pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management. Lancet. 2015 Sep 26;386(10000):1278-1287. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00275-5.spa
dc.relation.references18. Deiters A, Drozd A, Parikh P, Markert R, Shim JK. Use of the Alvarado Score in Elderly Patients with Complicated and Uncomplicated Appendicitis. Am Surg. 2019 Apr 1;85(4):397-402.spa
dc.relation.references19. Di Saverio S, Podda M, De Simone B, Ceresoli M, Augustin G, Gori A, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis: 2020 update of the WSES Jerusalem guidelines. World J Emerg Surg. 2020 Apr 15;15(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s13017-020-00306-3.spa
dc.relation.references20. Sharma P, Hegde R, Kulkarni A, Soin P, Kochar P, Rotem E. Imaging right lower quadrant pain: Not always appendicitis. Clin Imaging. 2020 Jul;63:65-82. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2020.02.012.spa
dc.relation.references21. Jacob R, Shavit I. Emergency Department Pain Management of Acute Abdominal Pain and Acute Appendicitis in Children. Isr Med Assoc J. 2016 Nov;18(11):689-691.spa
dc.relation.references22. Leuthauser A, McVane B. Abdominal Pain in the Geriatric Patient. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2016 May;34(2):363-75. doi: 10.1016/j.emc.2015.12.009spa
dc.relation.references23. Chatbanchai W, Hedley AJ, Ebrahim SB, Areemit S, Hoskyns EW, de Dombal FT. Acute abdominal pain and appendicitis in north east Thailand. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 1989 Oct;3(4):448-59. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.1989.tb00532.x.spa
dc.relation.references24. Manterola C, Astudillo P, Losada H, Pineda V, Sanhueza A, Vial M. Analgesia in patients with acute abdominal pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18;(3):CD005660. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005660.pub2. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;(1):CD005660.spa
dc.relation.references25. Manterola C, Vial M, Moraga J, Astudillo P. Analgesia in patients with acute abdominal pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Jan 19;(1):CD005660. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005660.pub3spa
dc.relation.references26. Blandón EA, Correa JC. Analgesia en el paciente con abdomen agudo: ¿persiste el peligro?. Iatreia [Internet]. 2006 Mar [cited 2021 Nov 04] ; 19( 1 ): 62-70. Available from: http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0121-07932006000100006&lng=en.spa
dc.relation.references27. Navez B, Navez J. Laparoscopy in the acute abdomen. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2014 Feb;28(1):3-17. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2013.11.006.spa
dc.relation.references28. Andersson RE. Meta-analysis of the clinical and laboratory diagnosis of appendicitis. Br J Surg. 2004 Jan;91(1):28-37. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4464.spa
dc.relation.references29. Hong YR, Chung CW, Kim JW, Kwon CI, Ahn DH, Kwon SW, et al. Hyperbilirubinemia is a significant indicator for the severity of acute appendicitis. J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2012 Oct;28(5):247-52. doi: 10.3393/jksc.2012.28.5.247.spa
dc.relation.references30. Chang ST, Jeffrey RB, Olcott EW. Three-step sequential positioning algorithm during sonographic evaluation for appendicitis increases appendiceal visualization rate and reduces CT use. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Nov;203(5):1006-12. doi: 10.2214/AJR.13.12334.spa
dc.relation.references31. Sola R Jr, Theut SB, Sinclair KA, Rivard DC, Johnson KM, Zhu H, St et al. Standardized reporting of appendicitis-related findings improves reliability of ultrasound in diagnosing appendicitis in children. J Pediatr Surg. 2018 May;53(5):984-987. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.02.028.spa
dc.relation.references32. Howell JM, Eddy OL, Lukens TW, Thiessen ME, Weingart SD, Decker WW; American College of Emergency Physicians. Clinical policy: Critical issues in the evaluation and management of emergency department patients with suspected appendicitis. Ann Emerg Med. 2010 Jan;55(1):71-116. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.10.004.spa
dc.relation.references33. Park HC, Kim MJ, Lee BH. Randomized clinical trial of antibiotic therapy for uncomplicated appendicitis. Br J Surg. 2017 Dec;104(13):1785-1790. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10660spa
dc.relation.references34. Townsend CM, Beauchamp RD, Evers BM, Mattox KL. Sabiston textbook of surgery. 18th edition. Philadelphia: Ed. Elsevier; 2007. p. 1333-47spa
dc.relation.references35. Gorter RR, Eker HH, Gorter-Stam MA, Abis GS, Acharya A, Ankersmit M, et al. Diagnosis and management of acute appendicitis. EAES consensus development conference 2015. Surg Endosc. 2016 Nov;30(11):4668-4690. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5245-7.spa
dc.relation.references36. Jaschinski T, Mosch CG, Eikermann M, Neugebauer EA, Sauerland S. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Nov 28;11(11):CD001546. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001546.pub4.spa
dc.relation.references37. Jaschinski T, Mosch C, Eikermann M, Neugebauer EA. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in patients with suspected appendicitis: a systematic review of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. BMC Gastroenterol. 2015 Apr 15;15:48. doi: 10.1186/s12876-015-0277-3spa
dc.relation.references38. Rettenbacher T, Hollerweger A, Gritzmann N, Gotwald T, Schwamberger K, Ulmer H, Nedden DZ. Gastroenterology. 2002 Oct;123(4):992-8. doi: 10.1053/gast.2002.35956.spa
dc.relation.references39. Athanasiou CD, Robinson J, Yiasemidou M, Lockwood S, Markides GA. Laparoscopic vs open approach for transverse colon cancer. A systematic review and meta-analysis of short and long term outcomes. Int J Surg. 2017 May;41:78-85. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.03.050.spa
dc.relation.references40. Can we afford to do laparoscopic appendectomy in an academic hospital?Cothren CC, Moore EE, Johnson JL, Moore JB, Ciesla DJ, Burch JM - Am J Surg - December 1, 2005; 190 (6); 950-4spa
dc.relation.references41. Hester CA, Pickett M, Abdelfattah KR, Cripps MW, Dultz LA, Dumas RP, Grant JL, Luk S, Minei J, Park C, Shoultz TH. Comparison of Appendectomy for Perforated Appendicitis With and Without Abscess: A National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Analysis. J Surg Res. 2020 Jul;251:159-167. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.12.054. Epub 2020 Mar 6. PMID: 32151825spa
dc.relation.references42. Bolmers MDM, de Jonge J, van Rossem CC, van Geloven AAW, Bemelman WA; Snapshot Appendicitis Collaborative Study group. Discrepancies between Intraoperative and Histological Evaluation of the Appendix in Acute Appendicitis. J Gastrointest Surg. 2020 Sep;24(9):2088-2095. doi: 10.1007/s11605-019-04345-3. Epub 2019 Aug 13. PMID: 31410818.spa
dc.relation.references43. Fallahzadeh H. Should a laparoscopic appendectomy be done? Am Surg. 1998;64:231–233.spa
dc.relation.referencesPeiser JG, Greenberg D. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: results of a retrospective comparison in an Israeli hospital. Isr Med Assoc J. 2002;4:91–94spa
dc.subject.proposalapendicectomiaspa
dc.subject.proposalcomplicacionesspa
dc.publisher.grantorUniversidad Militar Nueva Granadaspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1f*
dc.type.hasversioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionspa
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad Militar Nueva Granadaspa
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad Militar Nueva Granadaspa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repository.unimilitar.edu.cospa
dc.rights.localAcceso abiertospa
dc.coverage.sedeMedicinaspa
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2


Archivos en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/