Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.creatorChacón-Henao, Juliana
dc.creatorArias-Pérez, José
dc.date2022-06-30
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-22T19:01:49Z
dc.date.available2023-03-22T19:01:49Z
dc.identifierhttps://revistas.unimilitar.edu.co/index.php/rfce/article/view/5945
dc.identifier10.18359/rfce.5945
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10654/43107
dc.descriptionOn a global scale, companies continue to advance in the implementation of artificial intelligence and robotization for technological development and product and service innovation; however, to achieve this successfully, they encounter internal obstacles, such as knowledge sabotage and the not-invented-here syndrome, which hinder the development of new products. This study analyzes the relationship between knowledge sabotage, the not- invented-here syndrome, and innovative performance and the moderating effect of awareness regarding artificial intelligence and robotization. The testing of the research model was carried out using structural equations in a sample of medium and low technology manufacturing and service companies in Medellín. It recognized that the not-invented-here syndrome positively influences the sabotage of knowledge and this acts negatively on innovative performance. The findings increase the literature on an emerging topic in Colombia such as the sabotage of knowledge and encourage research regarding the effect of artificial intelligence and robotization.en-US
dc.descriptionA escala mundial las empresas siguen avanzando en la implementación de inteligencia artificial y robotización para el desarrollo tecnológico y la innovación de productos y servicios; sin embargo, para lograrlo con éxito se encuentran con obstáculos internos, como el sabotaje de conocimientos y el síndrome no inventado aquí, que perjudican el desarrollo de nuevos productos. Este estudio analiza la relación entre el sabotaje de conocimientos, el síndrome no inventado aquí y el desempeño innovador y el efecto moderador de la conciencia en torno a la inteligencia artificial y a la robotización. El testeo del modelo de investigación se realizó mediante ecuaciones estructurales en una muestra de empresas manufactureras de media y baja tecnologías y de servicios de Medellín. Se identificó que el síndrome no inventado aquí influye positivamente en el sabotaje de conocimientos y este actúa negativamente sobre el desempeño innovador. Los hallazgos incrementan la literatura sobre un tema emergente en Colombia como el sabotaje de conocimiento e incentiva las investigaciones alrededor del efecto de la inteligencia artificial y la robotización.es-ES
dc.descriptionEm escala global, as empresas continuam avançando na implementação de inteligência artificial e robotização para o desenvolvimento tecnológico e inovação de produtos e serviços; porém, para isso, encontram obstáculos internos, como a sabotagem do conhecimento e a síndrome do não-inventado-aqui, que dificultam o desenvolvimento de novos produtos. Este estudo analisa a relação entre a sabotagem do conhecimento, a síndrome do não inventado aqui, e o desempenho inovador e o efeito moderador da conscientização em torno da inteligência artificial e da robotização. O teste do modelo de pesquisa foi realizado usando equações estruturais em uma amostra de empresas de manufatura e serviços de média e baixa tecnologia em Medellín. Identificou-se que a síndrome não inventada aqui influencia positivamente na sabotagem do conhecimento e isso atua negativamente no desempenho inovador. As descobertas aumentam a literatura sobre um tema emergente na Colômbia, como a sabotagem do conhecimento, e incentivam pesquisas sobre o efeito da inteligência artificial e da robotização.pt-BR
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.formattext/xml
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherUniversidad Militar Nueva Granadaes-ES
dc.relationhttps://revistas.unimilitar.edu.co/index.php/rfce/article/view/5945/5176
dc.relationhttps://revistas.unimilitar.edu.co/index.php/rfce/article/view/5945/5274
dc.relation/*ref*/Abubakar, A. M. y Arasli, H. (2016). Dear top Management, Please Don’t Make me a Cynic: Intention to Sabotage. Journal of Management Development, 35(10), 1266-1286. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-11-2015-0164
dc.relation/*ref*/Ambrose, M. L., Seabright, M. y Schminke, M. (2000). Sabotage in the Workplace. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society, 11, 17-27. https://doi.org/10.5840/iabsproc2000113
dc.relation/*ref*/Antons, D., Declerck, M., Diener, K., Koch, I. y Piller, F. T. (2017). Assessing the Not-Invented-Here Syndrome: Development and Validation of Implicit and Explicit Measurements. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(8), 1227-1245. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2199
dc.relation/*ref*/Antons, D. y Piller, F. T. (2015). Opening the Black Box of “Not Invented Here”: Attitudes, Decision Biases, and Behavioral Consequences. Academy of Management Perspectives, 29(2), 193-217. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2013.0091
dc.relation/*ref*/Arias-Pérez, J. y Vélez-Jaramillo, J. (2021). Understanding Knowledge Hiding under Technological Turbulence Caused by Artificial Intelligence and Robotics. Journal of Knowledge Management, ahead-of-p (ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-01-2021-0058
dc.relation/*ref*/Arias-Pérez, J. y Vélez-Jaramillo, J. (2022). Ignoring the Three-Way Interaction of Digital Orientation, Not-Invented-Here Syndrome and Employee’s Artificial Intelligence Awareness in Digital Innovation Performance: A Recipe for Failure. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 174, 121-305. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121305
dc.relation/*ref*/Brougham, D. y Haar, J. (2018). Smart Technology, Artificial Intelligence, Robotics, and Algorithms (STARA): Employees’ Perceptions of our Future Workplace. Journal of Management & Organization, 24(2), 239-257. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1017/jmo.2016.55
dc.relation/*ref*/Canhoto, A. I. y Clear, F. (2020). Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning as Business Tools: A Framework for Diagnosing Value Destruction Potential. Business Horizons, 63(2), 183-193. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2019.11.003
dc.relation/*ref*/CPC, E. C. P. de C. (2020). Informe Nacional dee Competitividad 2020-2021.
dc.relation/*ref*/de Araújo-Burcharth, A. L., Knudsen, M. P. y Søndergaard, H. A. (2014). Neither Invented nor Shared here: The Impact and Management of Attitudes for the Adoption of Open Innovation Practices. Technovation, 34(3), 149-161. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2013.11.007
dc.relation/*ref*/Hair, J., Risher, J., Sarstedt, M. y Ringle, C. (2019). When to Use and How to Report the Results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2-24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
dc.relation/*ref*/Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. y Sarstedt, M. (2021). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications.
dc.relation/*ref*/Hannen, J., Antons, D., Piller, F., Salge, T. O., Coltman, T. y Devinney, T. M. (2019). Containing the Not-Invented-Here Syndrome in External Knowledge Absorption and Open Innovation: The Role of Indirect Countermeasures. Research Policy, 48(9), 103-822. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.103822
dc.relation/*ref*/Hurmelinna-Laukkanen, P. y Puumalainen, K. (2013). Innovation Performance in the Shadow of Expropriability-Interplay of the Appropriability Regime and Competitors’absorptive Capacity. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 10(1), 1-22. DOI:10.1142/S0219877013500028
dc.relation/*ref*/Hussinger, K. y Wastyn, A. (2016). In Search for the Not-Invented-Here Syndrome: the Role of Knowledge Sources and Firm Success. R&D Management, 46(S3), 945-957. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12136
dc.relation/*ref*/Iqbal, S., Rasheed, M., Khan, H. y Siddiqi, A. (2020). Human Resource Practices and Organizational Innovation Capability: Role of Knowledge Management. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 51(5), 732-748. https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-02-2020-0033
dc.relation/*ref*/Kock, N. y Hadaya, P. (2018). Minimum Sample Size Estimation in PLS-SEM: The Inverse Square Root and Gamma-Exponential Methods. Information Systems Journal, 28(1), 227-261. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12131
dc.relation/*ref*/Leonardi, V., García Casal, I. y Cristiana, G. (2009). Desempeño innovador de un grupo de mipymes agroindustriales argentinas. Economía y Sociedad, 14(23), 45-64.
dc.relation/*ref*/Li, J., Bonn, M. A. y Ye, B. H. (2019). Hotel Employee’s Artificial Intelligence and Robotics Awareness and its Impact on Turnover Intention: The Moderating Roles of Perceived Organizational Support and Competitive Psychological Climate. Tourism Management, 73, 172-181. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2019.02.006
dc.relation/*ref*/Lichtenthaler, U. (2019). Extremes of Acceptance: Employee Attitudes toward artificial Intelligence. Journal of Business Strategy, 41(5), 39-45. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBS-12-2018-0204
dc.relation/*ref*/Lichtenthaler, U. y Ernst, H. (2006). Attitudes to Externally Organising Knowledge Management Tasks: a Review, Reconsideration and Extension of the NIH Syndrome. R&D Management, 36(4), 367-386. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00443.x
dc.relation/*ref*/Nam, T. (2019). Technology Usage, Expected Job Sustainability, and Perceived Job Insecurity. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 138, 155-165. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.08.017
dc.relation/*ref*/Nestle, V., Täube, F. A., Heidenreich, S. y Bogers, M. (2019). Establishing Open Innovation Culture in Cluster Initiatives: The Role of Trust and Information Asymmetry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 146, 563–572. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.06.022
dc.relation/*ref*/Papa, A., Dezi, L., Gregori, G. L., Mueller, J. y Miglietta, N. (2018). Improving Innovation Performance Through Knowledge Acquisition: the Moderating Role of Employee Retention and Human Resource Management Practices. Journal of Knowledge Management, 24(3), 589-605. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-09-2017-0391
dc.relation/*ref*/Ritala, P., Olander, H., Michailova, S. y Husted, K. (2015). Knowledge Sharing, Knowledge Leaking and Relative Innovation Performance: An empirical Study. Technovation, 35, 22-31. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2014.07.011
dc.relation/*ref*/Serenko, A. (2019). Knowledge Sabotage as an Extreme form of Counterproductive Knowledge Behavior: Conceptualization, Typology, and Empirical Demonstration. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(7), 1260-1288. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-01-2018-0007
dc.relation/*ref*/Serenko, A. (2020). Knowledge Sabotage as an Extreme form of Counterproductive Knowledge Behavior: the Perspective of the Target. Journal of Knowledge Management, 24(4), 737-773. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-06-2019-0337
dc.relation/*ref*/Serenko, A. y Wei, C. C. (2020). Knowledge Sabotage as an Extreme form of Counterproductive Knowledge Behavior: the Role Of Narcissism, Machiavellianism, Psychopathy, and Competitiveness. Journal of Knowledge Management, 24(9), 2299-2325. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-06-2020-0416
dc.relation/*ref*/Suseno, Y., Standing, C., Kiani-Mavi, R. y Jackson, P. (2020). National Innovation Performance: the Role of Human Capital and Social Capital. Innovation, 33(3), 296-310. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2018.1536536
dc.relation/*ref*/WEF. (2018). The Future of Jobs Report 2018. World Economic Forum.
dc.relation/*ref*/Zakariya, R. y Bashir, S. (2020). Can Knowledge Hiding Promote Creativity Among IT Professionals. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems. 51(5), 693-712. https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-02-2020-0031
dc.rightsDerechos de autor 2022 Revista Facultad de Ciencias Económicases-ES
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0es-ES
dc.sourceRevista Facultad de Ciencias Económicas; Vol. 30 No. 1 (2022); 131-143en-US
dc.sourceRevista Facultad de Ciencias Económicas; Vol. 30 Núm. 1 (2022); 131-143es-ES
dc.sourceRevista Facultad de Ciencias Económicas; v. 30 n. 1 (2022); 131-143pt-BR
dc.source1909-7719
dc.source0121-6805
dc.subjectsabotageen-US
dc.subjectconcealmenten-US
dc.subjectknowledgeen-US
dc.subjectinnovationen-US
dc.subjectartificial intelligenceen-US
dc.subjectdigital transformationen-US
dc.subjectsabotajees-ES
dc.subjectocultamientoes-ES
dc.subjectconocimientoes-ES
dc.subjectinnovaciónes-ES
dc.subjectinteligencia artificiales-ES
dc.subjecttransformación digitales-ES
dc.subjectsabotagempt-BR
dc.subjectocultaçãopt-BR
dc.subjectconhecimentopt-BR
dc.subjectinovaçãopt-BR
dc.subjectinteligência artificialpt-BR
dc.subjecttransformação digitalpt-BR
dc.titleThe Not Invented Here Syndrome, Knowledge Sabotage, and Breakthrough Performance: The Role of Employee Awareness on Artificial Intelligenceen-US
dc.titleSíndrome no inventado aquí, sabotaje de conocimiento y desempeño innovador: el rol de la conciencia de los empleados sobre la inteligencia artificiales-ES
dc.titleSíndrome não inventado aqui, sabotagem do conhecimento e desempenho inovador: o papel da conscientização dos funcionários sobre a inteligência artificialpt-BR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Archivos en el ítem

ArchivosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay archivos asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem